martedì 12 novembre 2013

Unit 15 - November 21st

15 Filogenesis, ontogenesis


Dingemanse Torreira Enfield 2013 Is ‘‘Huh’’ a Universal Word - Conversational infrastracture and the convergent evolution of Linguistic Items

Tomasello-Carpenter 2007 shared intentionality
http://www.eva.mpg.de/psycho/pdf/Publications_2007_PDF/Shared_intentionality_07.pdf

H. Clark social-actions, social commitments 06
http://www.cs.utep.edu/dynamics/clark-social-actions-06.pdf

Levinson 2006 On the human interactional engine
http://www.ilc.cnr.it/~lenci/Levinson-HumanInteractionEngine.pdf

Terrence W.Deacon. (1997). Symbolic origin. Ch. 12 in The_Symbolic_Species. New York, W.W. Norton & Co.

Bickerton, Derek. (1990). The Fossils of Language. Chapter 5, pp.105-129 in Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.



venerdì 1 novembre 2013

Final assignment


Students must provide a one-page description of their ideas, projects and interests by November 11th, Monday, and generate a list of 3 bibliographic citations representing their area of interest.

There will be three possible ways of writing the final paper:

1. - Theoretical paper

2. - Research proposal paper

3. - Empirical research paper

1. Theoretical paper
Your paper must be based on sound exposition of the primary texts used in this course as well as your own reasoned arguments. You are required to base your answers on materials that include the primary sources covered in the course. One of the themes of the course could be the focus of your paper (frame, Self, group, meaning, interaction order, intentionality, ritual, speech acts, emotions, senses, talk-in-interaction, etc.). In the paper you should present theoretical issues on the studies of communication starting from your perspective, offering a conceptual and categorical analysis together with mentions of empirical studies, or links to classical or contemporary sociological theory, or references to particular substantive subjects of sociological studies (inequalities, gender, family, youth, consumption, fad & fashion, new media, etc.).

2. Research proposal paper
The student proposes a research topic and design addressing any of the substantive areas concerning communication that has been covered in this course. The paper should present the ways in which a particular topic can be studied from an empirical point of view. Your paper must have a 8-paragraph structure: 1. Research topic and main aims of the research; 2. Brief reconstruction and critique of previous studies on the topic; 3. Methodology to be used; 4. Context(s) of the research; 5. Phases and timing of the research; 6. Expected results; 7. Budget; 8. Bibliography.

3. Empirical research paper
The paper is based on a (detailed) analysis of some kind of empirical data or materials using the conceptual structure and analytical attitude that has been fostered in this course. Data and materials must be quick to gather and easy to handle (examples can be: movies, tv shows, recordings of actual conversations, literary fictions and novels, newspapers). You should (1) present clearly the focus of your research, mentioning one of the subjects or topics covered in the course and explaining its relevance and connection for your research; (2) describe the data and materials on which your research is based; (3) present your findings, analysis, intuitions, etc. in an articulated way; (4) provide a summary of the main points of your research; (5) provide a bibliography.

Your paper must have a title. The paper should be no longer than 5.000 words, 30.000 characters spaces included (about 10 pages). In the class we will talk about your ideas, projects, topics, and the ways in which your paper could be organized.

giovedì 31 ottobre 2013

Re-scheduling of the class

Language & Society 2013-2014
room 14, 6-8pm

October
Tuesday 1 Unit 1 - Introduction to the course
Thursday 3 Unit 2 - Two models for communication

Tuesday 8 Unit 3 – Temporal organization of the activities
Thursday 10 Unit 4 - The constitution of the perceptual world

Tuesday 15 Unit 5 - Group
Thursday 17 Unit 6 - Self

Tuesday 22 Unit 7 – Frame Analysis
Thursday 24 Unit 8 – Interaction order

Tuesday 29 Unit 9 – Ritual and symbolism
Thursday 31 Unit 10 – Institutional order

November
Tuesday 5 Unit 11 – Action, activities, intentionality
Thursday 7 NO CLASS

MONDAY 11 – PROJECT WORK
Tuesday 12 Unit 12 - Emotions
Thursday 14 Unit 13 - Senses

MONDAY 18 – PROJECT WORK
Tuesday 19 Unit 14 – Animals
Thursday 21 Unit 15 – Filogenesis, ontogenesis

Monday 25 – Unit 16 - Meaning and interpretations
Tuesday 26 Unit 17 – Linguistics and sociolinguistics
Thursday 28 NO CLASS

December
MONDAY 2 – PROJECT WORK
Tuesday 3 Unit 18 - Ethnomethodology
Thursday 5 Unit 19 – Conversation Analysis

MONDAY 9 – PROJECT WORK
Tuesday 10 Unit 20 – Wrap up
Thursday 12 NO CLASS - Universiadi

Tuesday 17 NO CLASS
Thursday 19 NO CLASS – Universiadi


mercoledì 23 ottobre 2013

Unit 16 - November 25th

16 Meaning and interpretation

G.H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press chap. 8, 9, 10, 11

B. Malinowski, The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages
pp.296-336

C. Geertz, Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, pp. 3-32

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Sheed and Ward, 1975. Rev. Ed. London: Continuum, 1989. EXCERPTS:
In ITALIAN see:

Unit 13 - November 14th

13 Senses

Simmel, Excursus on the sociology of the senses, in Sociology (or. ed. 1908)
In GERMAN:
In ENGLISH
In ITALIAN

Gale Peter Largey and David Rodney Watson The Sociology of Odors, American Journal of Sociology , Vol. 77, No. 6 (May, 1972), pp. 1021-1034
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776218

Rotter 2011 Empires of the Senses - How Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching Shaped Imperial Encounters

Unit 12 - November 12th

12 Emotions

M. Mauss, “L'expression obligatoire des sentiments (rituels oraux funéraires australiens”. (1921)
http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/mauss_marcel/essais_de_socio/T3_expression_sentiments/expression_sentiments.html
The ENGLISH translation (with an introduction by C. Garces and A. Jones, 2009)
http://anthropology.cornell.edu/faculty/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&PageID=139765
The ITALIAN translation:
http://www.adelphi.it/libro/9788845902475

Erving Goffman Response Cries, Language , Vol. 54, No. 4 (Dec., 1978), pp. 787-815
http://www.jstor.org/stable/413235
The ITALIAN translation is in this book (chap. 2):
http://www.mulino.it/edizioni/volumi/scheda_volume.php?vista=scheda&ISBNART=01552

Arlie Russell Hochschild, 1979. "Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure." American Journal of Sociology 85, 3: 551-575.
https://campus.fsu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/academic/social_sciences/sociology/Reading%20Lists/Social%20Psych%20Prelim%20Readings/II.%20Emotions/1979%20Hochschild%20-%20Emotion%20Work.pdf

Arnold Arluke. “Managing Emotions in an Animal Shelter.” Inside Social Life, pp. 337-351
oppure

Spencer E. Cahill and Robin Eggleston, Managing Emotions in Public: The Case of Wheelchair Users, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4 (Dec., 1994), pp. 300-312
http://renazito.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/cahill-and-eggleston-1994-managing-emotions-in-public.pdf

sabato 12 ottobre 2013

Unit 11 - November 5th

11 Action, activities and intentionality

1. Hubert DREYFUS and Jerome WAKEFIELD, "Intentionality and the Phenomenology of Action", John Searle and his Critics, E. Lepore & R. Van Guhck, edts., (Cambridge, UK : Basil Blackwell, 1991), 264

2. John R. SEARLE, "Response : The Background of Intentionality and Action," in John Searle and his Critics, E. Lepore & R. Van Guhck, edts , (Cambridge, UK : Basil Blackwell, 1991)

3. Hubert L Dreyfus, "Heidegger's Critique of the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality," Social Research Vol. 60, No. 1, (Spring 1993).

4. John Searle, “The Limits of Phenomenology”, Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume Two, MIT Press, 2000.

5. Hubert L. Dreyfus, “Phenomenological Description versus Rational Reconstruction”, La Revue Internationale de Philosophie, l999

6. John Searle, “Neither Phenomenological Description nor Rational Reconstruction”, La Revue Internationale de Philosophie l999

7. Hubert L. Dreyfus, “The Primacy of Phenomenology over Logical Analysis”, 1999

8. Hubert Dreyfus, ‘The Current Relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Embodiment’, Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy (1996),

The two contenders:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Dreyfus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Searle